2025 ICC Reimagining WTO dispute settlement
- Select
- English
Trade
Mediation under the World Trade Organization (WTO) Dispute Settlement Understanding can help governments resolve trade frictions faster, cheaper and more constructively – if they’re willing to use it. ICC is making the case.
Go directly to:
Most trade frictions never reach WTO dispute settlement. Many business concerns – licensing delays, technical barriers or opaque procedures – disrupt trade but are too small, sensitive or costly to escalate to formal dispute settlement.
That’s where alternative dispute resolution (ADR), and more specifically mediation, comes in. WTO rules already allow for it, but the tool has not been used, among other things, due to a lack of clear procedures.
That’s changing.
As part of the WTO reform process, WTO Members are discussing procedural rules to make mediation a workable option – and we can help accelerate this process by supporting governments willing to pilot mediation in practice.
For business
Companies face real costs from unresolved trade frictions. Mediation offers a practical and quicker way to resolve issues – and businesses can help identify where it’s needed.
For governments
Mediation gives WTO Members a lower-risk, lower-cost path to resolve trade issues early. It is especially important for developing countries that may lack resources for litigation.
ICC is advocating for the use of ADR, and in particular mediation within the WTO dispute settlement system as part of broader reform efforts. Drawing on ICC’s extensive experience as the world’s leading institution in cross-border dispute resolution, we’re supporting efforts to make mediation a practical option for resolving trade frictions more effectively.
We are actively seeking companies with unresolved trade concerns who are willing to engage their governments in pilot mediation cases. These cases can help demonstrate how WTO mediation can deliver fast, practical outcomes and strengthen trust in the rules-based system.
Contact Valerie Picard, Head of Trade, ICC, Valerie.Picard@iccwbo.org to learn more or explore a pilot case.
ICC has proposed a framework that sets out a holistic vision for reform of the World Trade Organization (WTO) from the perspective of the global business community. Such a framework is necessary to ensure a comprehensive approach to reform across the three vital functions of the organisation.
Two studies commissioned by ICC and conducted by Oxford Economics highlight the devastating effects of a collapse of the WTO system. The 2024 report shows the severe impact on developing economies across regions. The 2025 follow-up report provides a detailed, country-level analysis across ten developing economies — Brazil, Cameroon, China, Egypt, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, South Africa, Türkiye, and Vietnam — confirming how a breakdown of the WTO would have damaging country-level consequences.
A rules-based global trading system, with the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) most-favoured nation (MFN) principle at its core, provides the stability and predictability that businesses require for strategic planning, investment decisions, and day-to-day operations.