Suggested clause providing for the ICC as appointing authority for expert proceedings
- Select a language
- English
- Spanish
- French
Arbitration
Suggested clause providing for the ICC as appointing authority for expert proceedings in force as from 1 February 2015. Set out below is a suggested clause for use by parties who wish to have the ICC appoint an expert for ad hoc expert proceedings that are not administered by the ICC.
Go directly to:
There are also some notes on drafting a clause for the specific situation providing for ICC as the appointing authority for neutrals.
In the event of any dispute arising out of or in connection with [clause X of the present contract] the parties agree to submit the dispute to ad hoc expert proceedings. The expert shall be appointed by the ICC International Centre for ADR in accordance with the Rules for the Appointment of Experts and Neutrals of the International Chamber of Commerce.
Notes: The above clause may be used where the parties have provided in their contract for ad hoc expert proceedings (i.e. expert proceedings that are not administered by the ICC) but wish to have the ICC International Centre for ADR appoint the expert. In order to use the above clause, the parties will need to replace the phrase “[clause x of the present contract]” with a reference to the relevant contractual provision(s), so as to identify clearly the type of dispute(s) to be referred to the expert proceedings.
Parties are also advised to take account of any factors, such as the requirements of mandatory law that may have an impact on the effect of a clause or its enforceability under applicable law.
Parties may wish to have ICC appoint a neutral for
ad hoc mediation, neutral evaluation, dispute boards or other similar dispute resolution proceedings. Given the broad range of situations, it is not possible to offer a suggested clause that easily fits every circumstance. Therefore, these notes are provided to assist parties in drafting their tailor-made clause.
At all times, care must be taken to avoid any risk of ambiguity in the drafting of the clause. Unclear wording causes uncertainty and delay and can hinder or even compromise the dispute resolution process.