Arbitration and ADR
Managing international arbitration in a multi-jurisdictional landscape
In this guest blog, Omani & Partners share perspectives on managing international arbitration in a multi-jurisdictional landscape following discussions held at the 14th ICC MENA Conference on International Arbitration.

Dr. Nasser Al-Adba
Founder & Managing Director
Omani & Partners
As global commerce continues to expand, international arbitration has become a preferred mechanism for resolving disputes arising from cross-border transactions. This is particularly evident in regions such as the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), where international investment, infrastructure development and energy projects frequently involve parties from multiple jurisdictions.
Successfully navigating these disputes requires not only technical legal expertise, but also an appreciation of regional legal traditions and commercial realities.
Addressing jurisdictional and procedural challenges
International arbitration often involves complex questions of applicable law, jurisdiction and enforcement. In the MENA region, arbitration proceedings may intersect with civil law systems, common law influences and Sharia-based principles. These layered frameworks can create uncertainty if not addressed at an early stage.
Practitioners must carefully analyse arbitration clauses, governing law provisions and procedural rules under institutions such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), or regional centres. A clear understanding of local court attitudes toward arbitration and enforcement under the New York Convention is also essential to managing risk and ensuring procedural efficiency.
Practical strategies for effective arbitration
A structured and disciplined approach is key to managing international arbitration successfully. Effective strategies often include:
- Early case assessment to identify legal and commercial exposure;
- Strategic forum selection aligned with enforcement considerations;
- Culturally informed advocacy tailored to the tribunal and parties involved;
- Close coordination with local counsel to address jurisdiction-specific issues.
These measures allow parties to maintain control over cost, timing and outcomes while preserving commercial relationships where possible.
Illustrative example: cross-border energy dispute
In a recent arbitration concerning a regional energy project, the dispute involved overlapping contractual frameworks and multiple governing laws. Through careful procedural planning and coordinated advocacy, the matter was resolved efficiently, highlighting the importance of preparation and jurisdictional awareness in complex arbitrations.
Conclusion
International arbitration remains a vital tool for resolving cross-border disputes, particularly in dynamic regions such as MENA. Success depends on strategic planning, regional insight and a pragmatic understanding of both legal and commercial considerations. With the right approach, arbitration can offer parties clarity, enforceability and long-term certainty in an increasingly interconnected world.
*Disclaimer: The content of this article may not reflect the official views of the International Chamber of Commerce. The opinions expressed are solely those of the authors and other contributors.
